DAVID F. RANSOHOFF, M.D.; WILLIAM A. GRACIE, M.D.; LEWIS B. WOLFENSON, Ph.D.; DUNCAN NEUHAUSER, Ph.D.
Decision analysis was done to compare the consequences of prophylactic cholecystectomy with expectant management for silent gallstone disease. Probability values were derived from a study of the natural history of silent gallstone disease, published cholecystectomy mortality rates, and life tables. The two strategies were compared by calculating cumulative numbers of person-years lost for hypothetical cohorts of men and women. Prophylactic cholecystectomy slightly decreases survival. A 30-year-old man choosing prophylactic cholecystectomy instead of expectant management would lose, on average, 4 days of life; a 50-year-old man would lose 18 days. Consideration of monetary costs and discounting further disfavors prophylactic cholecystectomy. Sensitivity analysis shows that differences between the two strategies remain small over a broad range of probability values, both for men and women.
DAVID F. RANSOHOFF, WILLIAM A. GRACIE, LEWIS B. WOLFENSON, DUNCAN NEUHAUSER. Prophylactic Cholecystectomy or Expectant Management for Silent Gallstones: A Decision Analysis to Assess Survival. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:199–204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-2-199
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(2):199-204.
Biliary Disorders, Gastroenterology/Hepatology.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use