J. RANDALL MOORMAN, M.D.; MARK A. HLATKY, M.D.; DAVID M. EDDY, M.D., Ph.D.; GALEN S. WAGNER, M.D.
To evaluate the usefulness of the admission electrocardiogram, we prospectively studied 1410 patients admitted to a general medical service. The patients' history and physical examination were analyzed, and then the electrocardiogram was evaluated to determine whether it added new information. Fifty-two admission electrocardiograms added unique information; 31 established a new diagnosis, 28 of which changed management. Twenty-one electrocardiograms suggested a new diagnosis, 13 of which proved correct. Only age and a clinically evident cardiac abnormality predicted the yield of the admission electrocardiogram. Among patients with cardiac abnormalities, electrocardiogram yield was 8.5% in those 45 years or older and 2.5% in those younger. Among patients without cardiac abnormality, electrocardiogram yield was 1.0% overall and its cost-effectiveness was $24 000 per year of life saved. An admission electrocardiogram infrequently added new information to the clinical evaluation, but was useful when it did. Admission electrocardiograms are as cost-effective as many accepted medical practices.
J. RANDALL MOORMAN, MARK A. HLATKY, DAVID M. EDDY, GALEN S. WAGNER. The Yield of the Routine Admission Electrocardiogram: A Study in a General Medical Service. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:590–595. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-590
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(4):590-595.
Cardiac Diagnosis and Imaging, Cardiology.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use