JAMES R. WEBSTER, M.D.
To the editor: Brennan's (1) erudite discussion regarding the principles of testimony in toxic suits highlights a number of important issues and provides an excellent outline for expert medical witnesses and the lawyers who have to prepare them for trial. However, having recently finished extensive testimony in a dioxin suit (106 days, much of it on cross examination) (2), I think Brennan underestimates what I consider the major problem in such suits. I am speaking of the effects of so-called "experts" who reflexively and inductively support plaintiffs' claims to their own personal financial benefit.
One physician who testified for the
WEBSTER JR. Medical "Experts" in Litigation. Ann Intern Med. ;108:637–638. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-637_2
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1988;108(4):637-638.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use