This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
A book on scientific controversies usually is concerned with one of two subjects. Philosophers of science write about the role controversies play in the development of scientific knowledge, focusing on epistemology and the manner in which we define scientific truth and scientific progress. Political scientists and legal academics write about political controversies that center on scientific issues, emphasizing the difficulties of policy-making when science is imperfect. Both types of books acknowledge the special place of scientific knowledge in our society, but the policy analysts and philosophers rarely talk. Thus the books on epistemology do not address policy decisions, and books
Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology.. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:793–794. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-5-793_2
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1987;107(5):793-794.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use