Daniel Kent, MD
To the Editor: In the article on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1), there is an error in Table 2.
In this table, the true-positive ratio for the "Alternate" column and the first reference were transposed with the true-positive ratio for "MR Imaging" and the second reference. The 0.67 and its confidence interval in the "MR Imaging" column should replace the 0.98 and its confidence interval in the "Alternate" column. The 0.98 and its confidence interval should replace the 0.67 under "MR Imaging."
The text corresponding to this part of the table appears on page 405. The fifth sentence in the
Daniel Kent. Correction: Data in Review on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:438. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-438_2
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1988;109(5):438.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use