Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD; Ira S. Nash, MD
The economic forces that are reshaping the delivery of health care in the United States have led to intense examination of the appropriate roles for specialists and generalists. Resolving this issue has profound implications for the future of U.S. health care and for the economic health of academic training centers and individual physicians. The issues are particularly intense in cardiovascular care, a field that has had dramatic success in the application of new diagnostic and therapeutic technology and rapid growth in specialist practitioners but is now under pressure to shrink its ranks. A new generalist/cardiovascular specialist training track and a parallel reduction in the number of standard fellowship training positions in cardiovascular disease may be a partial solution. The first 2 years of the proposed 5-year program would consist of training in internal medicine, the final 2 would consist of training in cardiovascular disease, and the middle year would be a flexible combination of the two. Graduates would be Board eligible in internal medicine but would have enhanced competency in cardiovascular disease. This plan may improve the balance between generalists and specialists, improve the quality of primary and specialized cardiovascular care, and strengthen departments of medicine and academic training centers while facing new economic realities.
Valentin Fuster, Ira S. Nash. The Generalist/Cardiovascular Specialist: A Proposal for a New Training Track. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:630–634. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_Part_1-199710150-00008
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8_Part_1):630-634.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use