Noel T. Brewer, PhD; Talya Salz, BS; Sarah E. Lillie, MPH
Note: Portions of this paper were presented at the 2006 meetings of the American Society for Preventive Oncology, Bethesda, Maryland, 26–28 February 2006; the Society for Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco, California, 22–25 March 2006; and the Society of Judgment and Decision Making, Houston, Texas, 17–20 November 2006.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank colleagues who provided feedback on the study results and on earlier drafts of the manuscript.
Grant Support: By the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and the American Cancer Society (MSRG-06-259-01-CPPB).
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Noel Brewer, PhD, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, 306 Rosenau Hall CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; e-mail, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Brewer, Ms. Salz, and Ms. Lillie: Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, 306 Rosenau Hall CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Although abnormal screening mammograms deleteriously affect the psychological well-being of women during the time immediately surrounding the tests, their long-term effects are poorly understood.
To characterize the long-term effects of false-positive screening mammograms on the behavior and well-being of women 40 years of age or older.
English-language studies from the MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases through August 2006.
Studies were identified that examined the effects of false-positive results of routine screening mammography on women's behavior, well-being, or beliefs.
Two investigators independently coded study characteristics, quality, and effect sizes.
23 eligible studies (n = 313 967) were identified. A random-effects meta-analysis showed that U.S. women who received false-positive results on screening mammography were more likely to return for routine screening than those who received normal results (risk ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.12]). The effect was not statistically significant among European women (risk ratio, 0.97 [CI, 0.93 to 1.01]), and Canadian women were less likely to return for routine screening because of false-positive results (risk ratio, 0.63 [CI, 0.50 to 0.80]). Women who received false-positive results conducted more frequent breast self-examinations and had higher, but not apparently pathologically elevated, levels of distress and anxiety and thought more about breast cancer than did those with normal results.
Correlational study designs, a small number of studies, a lack of clinical validation for many measures, and possible heterogeneity.
Some women with false-positive results on mammography may have differences in whether they return for mammography, occurrence of breast self-examinations, and levels of anxiety compared with women with normal results. Future research should examine how false-positive results on mammography affect other outcomes, such as trust and health care use.
Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:502–510. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00006
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(7):502-510.
Breast Cancer, Hematology/Oncology.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use