Saul J. Weiner, MD; Alan Schwartz, PhD; Gunjan Sharma, PhD; Amy Binns-Calvey, BA; Naomi Ashley, BA; Brendan Kelly, BA; Amit Dayal, MD; Sonal Patel, MD; Frances M. Weaver, PhD; Ilene Harris, PhD
Disclaimer: Dr. Weiner had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for their integrity and the accuracy of the analysis.
Potential Conflicts of Interest: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M12-2719.
Reproducible Research Statement: Study protocol and statistical code: Available on request. Data set: Not available.
Requests for Single Reprints: Saul J. Weiner, MD, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2730 UH MC 103, 601 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607-7128; e-mail, email@example.com.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Weiner: Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Building 11A, R&D (MC 151), 820 South Damen Avenue, Chicago, IL 60612; University of Illinois at Chicago, 2730 UH MC 103, 601 South Morgan, Chicago, IL 60607-7128.
Drs. Schwartz and Harris and Ms. Binns-Calvey: Department of Medical Education, MC 591, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, 808 South Wood Street, Chicago, IL 60612.
Dr. Weaver and Mr. Kelly: Center for Management of Complex Chronic Care, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, 151H, Building 1, Room B260, 5000 South 5th Avenue, Hines, IL 60141.
Dr. Sharma and Ms. Ashley: Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Building 11A, MC 151, 820 South Damen Avenue, Chicago, IL 60612.
Dr. Dayal: Edward J. Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, South Primary Care Building 228, 3rd Floor, 5th and Roosevelt, Hines, IL 60141.
Dr. Patel: Durham VA Medical Center, Ambulatory Care Service, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: S.J. Weiner, A. Schwartz, A. Binns-Calvey, I. Harris.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: S.J. Weiner, A. Schwartz, G. Sharma, A. Binns-Calvey, N. Ashley, B. Kelly, A. Dayal, F.M. Weaver.
Drafting of the article: S.J. Weiner.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: S.J. Weiner, A. Schwartz, A. Binns-Calvey, S. Patel, F.M. Weaver, I. Harris.
Final approval of the article: S.J. Weiner, A. Schwartz, G. Sharma, A. Binns-Calvey, A. Dayal, F.M. Weaver, I. Harris.
Provision of study materials or patients: G. Sharma, A. Binns-Calvey, I. Harris.
Statistical expertise: A. Schwartz.
Obtaining of funding: S.J. Weiner.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: S.J. Weiner, G. Sharma, A. Binns-Calvey, A. Dayal, F.M. Weaver, I. Harris.
Collection and assembly of data: S.J. Weiner, G. Sharma, A. Binns-Calvey, N. Ashley, B. Kelly, A. Dayal, S. Patel.
Patient-centered decision making (PCDM) is the process of identifying clinically relevant, patient-specific circumstances and behaviors to formulate a contextually appropriate care plan.
To ascertain whether encounters in which PCDM occurs are followed by improved health care outcomes compared with encounters where there is inattention to patient context.
Patients surreptitiously audio-recorded encounters with their physicians. Medical records of these encounters were then screened for “contextual red flags,” such as deteriorating self-management of a chronic condition, that could reflect such underlying contextual factors as competing responsibilities or loss of social support. When a contextual factor was identified, either as a result of physician questioning or because a patient volunteered information, physicians were scored on the basis of whether they adapted the care plan to it.
Internal medicine clinics at 2 Veterans Affairs facilities.
774 patients audio-recorded encounters with 139 resident physicians.
Individualized outcome measures were based on the contextual red flag, such as improved blood pressure control in a patient presenting with hypertension and loss of medication coverage. Outcome coders were blinded to physician performance.
Among 548 contextual red flags, 208 contextual factors were confirmed, either when physicians probed or patients volunteered information. Physician attention to contextual factors (both probing for them and addressing them in care plans) varied according to the presenting contextual red flags. Outcome data were available for 157 contextual factors, of which PCDM was found to address 96. Of these, health care outcomes improved in 68 (71%), compared with 28 (46%) of the 61 that were not addressed by PCDM (P = 0.002).
The extent to which the findings can be generalized to other clinical settings is unknown.
Attention to patient needs and circumstances when planning care is associated with improved health care outcomes.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Weiner SJ, Schwartz A, Sharma G, Binns-Calvey A, Ashley N, Kelly B, et al. Patient-Centered Decision Making and Health Care Outcomes: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:573-579. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00001
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):573-579.
Healthcare Delivery and Policy.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only