Jeffrey K. Lee, MD, MAS; Elizabeth G. Liles, MD, MCR; Stephen Bent, MD; Theodore R. Levin, MD; Douglas A. Corley, MD, PhD
Acknowledgments: The authors thank James Allison, MD, for his expert review of our manuscript and Leslie Bienen, DVM, MFA, for her editing of the manuscript.
Grant Support: By the National Institutes of Health (T32DK007007), National Cancer Institute (U54 CA163262), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007007), National Cancer Institute Cancer Research Network (U24 CA171524), and Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (U54 CA163262).
Potential Conflicts of Interest: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M13-1484.
Requests for Single Reprints: Douglas A. Corley, MD, PhD, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612; e-mail, Douglas.Corley@kp.org.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Lee: University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-357, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Dr. Liles: Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227-1110.
Dr. Bent: Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center 111-A1, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121.
Drs. Levin and Corley: Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles, T.R. Levin, D.A. Corley.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles, S. Bent.
Drafting of the article: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles, S. Bent, T.R. Levin, D.A. Corley.
Final approval of the article: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles, S. Bent, T.R. Levin, D.A. Corley.
Provision of study materials or patients: J.K. Lee.
Statistical expertise: J.K. Lee, S. Bent.
Obtaining of funding: J.K. Lee.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles.
Collection and assembly of data: J.K. Lee, E.G. Liles.
Lee JK, Liles EG, Bent S, Levin TR, Corley DA. Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:171-181. doi: 10.7326/M13-1484
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(3):171-181.
Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) have been inconsistent.
To synthesize data about the diagnostic accuracy of FITs for CRC and identify factors affecting its performance characteristics.
Online databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, and bibliographies of included studies from 1996 to 2013.
All studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of FITs for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk adults.
Two reviewers independently extracted data and critiqued study quality.
Nineteen eligible studies were included and meta-analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of FITs for CRC were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.86), 0.94 (CI, 0.92 to 0.95), 13.10 (CI, 10.49 to 16.35), 0.23 (CI, 0.15 to 0.33), respectively, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95% (CI, 93% to 97%). There was substantial heterogeneity between studies in both the pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates. Stratifying by cutoff value for a positive test result or removal of discontinued FIT brands resulted in homogeneous sensitivity estimates. Sensitivity for CRC improved with lower assay cutoff values for a positive test result (for example, 0.89 [CI, 0.80 to 0.95] at a cutoff value less than 20 µg/g vs. 0.70 [CI, 0.55 to 0.81] at cutoff values of 20 to 50 µg/g) but with a corresponding decrease in specificity. A single-sample FIT had similar sensitivity and specificity as several samples, independent of FIT brand.
Only English-language articles were included. Lack of data prevented complete subgroup analyses by FIT brand.
Fecal immunochemical tests are moderately sensitive, are highly specific, and have high overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting CRC. Diagnostic performance of FITs depends on the cutoff value for a positive test result.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Cancer Institute.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Cancer Screening/Prevention, Colorectal Cancer, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Hematology/Oncology.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only