Kevin Quinn, MA
Acknowledgment: The author thanks Robert Coulam, Julian Pettengill, and Norbert Goldfield for valuable advice.
Potential Conflicts of Interest: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M13-2115.
Requests for Single Reprints: Kevin Quinn, MA, Xerox Corporation, 34 North Last Chance Gulch, Helena, MT 59601; e-mail, email@example.com.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: K. Quinn.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: K. Quinn.
Drafting of the article: K. Quinn.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: K. Quinn.
Final approval of the article: K. Quinn.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: K. Quinn.
Collection and assembly of data: K. Quinn.
Quinn K. After the Revolution: DRGs at Age 30. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:426-429. doi: 10.7326/M13-2115
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(6):426-429.
1 October 2013 marked 30 years since Medicare began paying hospitals by diagnosis-related group (DRG), arguably the most influential innovation in the history of health care financing. Initially developed as a tool for hospital management, DRGs became the basis of the inpatient prospective payment system that Medicare implemented in 1983. The strong incentives were revolutionary in their impact. Medicare spending growth slowed sharply, and, more remarkable, hospitals posted record profits. After the link between cost and payment was broken, hospitals moved quickly to cut costs. Nevertheless, a literature survey concluded that none of the worst fears about adverse effects on patients were realized. Diagnosis-related groups have also come to define “the product of a hospital” for purposes of benchmarking and risk adjustment. The acceptance of DRG algorithms owes much to their categorical approach, clinical focus, and transparency. The 2 most commonly used algorithms, Medicare DRGs and All Patient Refined (APR) DRGs, typically explain more than 40% of cost variance in inpatient stays, although with considerable range by care category. Because Medicare DRGs are unsuitable for obstetrics, pediatrics, and neonatology, some payers prefer APR DRGs. Diagnosis-related groups have proven to be a suitable basis for payment, as evidenced by widespread use. Common issues include mitigation of adverse incentives, appropriate payment for extremely costly stays, applicability to certain hospitals and care categories, and growing complexity. The DRG experience offers lessons about the effectiveness of financial incentives, the likelihood of adverse effects, the usefulness of case-mix measures, the risks of growing complexity, and the example that sensible policy need not be the domain of any one political party or other entity.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only