David H. Wesorick, MD; Vineet Chopra, MD, MSc
Disclosures: Dr. Chopra reports grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Wesorick has disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M16-1400.
This study suggests that patients receiving first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents with DAPT scores of 2 or higher benefit from extended courses of DAPT. However, these stents are no longer routinely used, having been replaced by later-generation stents, limiting the applicability of these results to practice.
This study supports the use of a shorter course of DAPT for patients with DAPT scores lower than2. These patients experienced no benefit and had higher rates of bleeding when treated with extended DAPT courses.
An editorial notes that further investigation will be needed to define the optimal duration of DAPT in the age of advancing stent technology and discusses other currently available clinical calculators for determining DAPT duration.
In general, this article supports the current practice of placing ICDs for primary prevention in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in selected patients with the appropriate degree of left ventricular dysfunction or symptoms at least 40 days after acute myocardial infarction.
Among appropriate patients, hospitalists should consider discussing ICD implantation at the time of discharge and ensuring appropriate follow up for evaluation.
Hospitals and health systems should learn from other industries and embrace emerging design concepts and advances in technology to optimize the patient experience.
Simple fixes, such as improving signs to assist with navigation, appear to be low-hanging fruit for improvement.
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
Wesorick DH, Chopra V. Annals for Hospitalists - 18 July 2017. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:HO1. doi: 10.7326/AFHO201707180
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(2):HO1.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only