JAMES B. HERRICK
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
There is a tendency nowadays to attack the stethoscope. It is criticized in print, in addresses in medical societies and in conversation between doctors. As a result it is losing caste as an instrument of diagnosis. Moreover, its loss of prestige carries with it a lessened appreciation of physical diagnosis in general, once a most highly regarded feature in medicine.
The charges against the stethoscope are two: that it is antiquated, its place taken by other methods especially by the x-ray, and that it does more harm than good because its findings are so often misinterpreted.
As to the first
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
HERRICK JB. In Defense of the Stethoscope(In Defense of the Stethoscope*). Ann Intern Med. 1930;4:113–116. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-4-2-113
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1930;4(2):113-116.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only