ARTHUR M. MASTER, M.D.
To the editor: In their recent ANNALS paper (74:509-517, 1971) on correlations with the two-step test, Fitz-Gibbon and associates stated, "The double Master's two-step test yields an unacceptable number of "false positive" results. . . . The prevalence of "false negative" results indicates that reliance on the test in excluding the presence of even grave coronary artery disease is unwarranted."
The authors depend almost wholly on their angiographic findings. Yet coronary angiography is far from foolproof. Scores of papers make this point. A large number of studies have shown that angiography fails to demonstrate coronary disease in about 15% of
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
MASTER AM. Master's Two-Step Test. Ann Intern Med. 1971;75:804–805. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-75-5-804
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1971;75(5):804-805.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only