DAVID L. SACKETT, M.D., M.Sc. Epid.; WALTER O. SPITZER, M.D., M.H.A., M.P.H.; MICHAEL GENT, M. Sc.; ROBIN S. ROBERTS, M. Tech.; W. IAN HAY, M.B., B.S.; GEORGIE M. LEFROY, R.N.; G. PATRICK SWEENY, B.Sc., M.D., C.M.; ISABEL VANDERVLIST, R.N.; JOHN C. SIBLEY, M.D., F.R.C.P. (C), M.R.C.P., F.A.C.C., F.A.C.P.; LARRY W. CHAMBERS, M.Sc.; CHARLES H. GOLDSMITH, Ph.D.; ALEXANDER S. MACPHERSON, M.D., D. Psych, M.Sc.; RONALD G. McAULEY, M.D., CM.
SACKETT DL, SPITZER WO, GENT M, ROBERTS RS, HAY WI, LEFROY GM, et al. The Burlington Randomized Trial of the Nurse Practitioner: Health Outcomes of Patients. Ann Intern Med. 1974;80:137-142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-80-2-137
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1974;80(2):137-142.
In a randomized trial of nurse practitioners as providers of primary clinical services, attention was devoted to the "outcomes" of clinical effectiveness and safety. These outcomes—expressed in physical, emotional, and social function—were assessed with newly developed methods that could be applied easily and objectively by nonclinicians to the two groups of patients under study: patients receiving conventional care and patients receiving care from nurse practitioners. Besides showing the comparability of these groups at the start of this study, these measurements showed similar levels of physical, emotional, and social function in the two groups after 1 year of receiving either nurse-practitioner or conventional care. Since the numbers of patients were large enough for a statistical detection of even small differences, the results indicate that the nurse practitioners were effective and safe. This study provides a base from which to explore the "process" of delivering primary clinical services by nurse practitioners.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only