LISA RUBENSTEIN, M.D.; SUSAN MATES, M.D.; VICTOR W. SIDEL, M.D.
Weighted process criteria based on chart review using an algorithmic method, and weighted outcome criteria based on a telephone interview with the patient, were used to assess the quality of emergency room care of women with symptoms of acute urinary tract infection. Outcomes at a municipal hospital were significantly better than those at an affiliated voluntary hospital. Process and outcome scores were positively correlated at both hospitals; the data suggest, but do not themselves adequately test, the hypothesis that the correlation is curvilinear and that there is a threshold process score below which a poor outcome is extremely likely. Our findings suggest that weighted algorithmic assessment criteria are a useful method for quality assessment and are consistent with the testable hypothesis that the greatest improvements in outcome may result from raising the quality of care from a poor to an adequate level rather than from an adequate to an optimal level.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
RUBENSTEIN L, MATES S, SIDEL VW. Quality-of-Care Assessment by Process and Outcome Scoring: Use of Weighted Algorithmic Assessment Criteria for Evaluation of Emergency Room Care of Women with Symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection. Ann Intern Med. 1977;86:617–625. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-86-5-617
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1977;86(5):617-625.
Emergency Medicine, Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Infectious Disease, Nephrology, Urinary Tract Infection.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only