This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Critical peer review of papers before they are accepted for publication is the main assurance to readers of journals that what they read is both sound in content and worth their attention. Modern medicine is so wide-reaching and so complex that editors can not assess most papers with the close scrutiny they expect of the consultants who volunteer to render expert judgments. But the peer review system is not flawless. Consultants' omissions, errors, and misjudgments sometimes escape detection by an editor who then rejects papers he or she should have accepted or accepts papers not worth the space in the
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Our Thanks to Our Consultants. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:119. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-119_2
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(1):119.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only