STUART J. YOUNGNER, M.D.; EDWARD T. BARTLETT, Ph.D.
Modern technology has raised questions about the definition of death, and various factors that influence public policy about declaring people dead. The widely accepted "whole-brain" definition of death is inadequate and should be replaced by a definition of "irreversible loss of consciousness and cognition." Any definition that identifies the innate ability of the organism to "integrate" itself or function "as a whole" should be rejected. The proponents of such definitions fail to provide a standard for the selection of essential sub-systems. The innate integration of vegetative functions cannot be used as the necessary and sufficient condition for life. A person without innate integration can still be alive; a dead person retaining just this function can survive as a living, mindless organism. Only cognitive functions have a spontaneity that is, in principle, irreplaceable.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
YOUNGNER SJ, BARTLETT ET. Human Death and High Technology: The Failure of the Whole-Brain Formulations. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:252–258. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-2-252
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(2):252-258.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only