This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Childress argues that paternalism justifies practices, policies, and acts in medicine, and he aims to test the adequacy of these justifications. His is the most important book on this topic to date.
The first of two appendices contains 22 paternalism cases that are discussed throughout the text. The second appendix contrasts the author's position on paternalism, defined as "a refusal to accept or acquiesce in another person's wishes, choices and actions for that person's own benefit" (page 13), with that of Gert and Culver. Childress objects to their rejection of paternalism on the narrow grounds of consequences and violations of
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Who Should Decide? Paternalism in Health Care.. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:825. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-2-285_1
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(2):825.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only