JERROLD A. VAN DYKE, M.D.; ROBERT J. STANLEY, M.D.; LINCOLN L. BERLAND, M.D.
▸Requests for reprints should be addressed to Jerrold A. Van Dyke, M.D.; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, 619 South 19th Street; Birmingham, AL 35233.
VAN DYKE JA, STANLEY RJ, BERLAND LL. Pancreatic Imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:212-217. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-2-212
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1985;102(2):212-217.
Methods now available for evaluating the pancreas include computed tomography, ultrasound, angiography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and percutaneous fine-needle aspiration. Computed tomography is best for initial evaluation of the patient with suspected pancreatic disorders as it is technically adequate and provides detailed anatomic information. Ultrasound also provides detailed information and survey capabilities but examinations are often technically unsatisfactory. Angiography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and fine-needle aspiration provide important diagnostic information but are more invasive and require considerable operator skill. These techniques are secondary tests not indicated for the initial evaluation of every patient. No single test will always provide all necessary diagnostic information, and the appropriate utilization of each method requires an understanding of its strengths and weaknesses.
to gain full access to the content and tools.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Pancreatic Disease.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only