THOMAS P. STOSSEL, M.D.
Beginning 2 centuries ago, commentators have seen an excessive volume of scientific publications as linked to intellectual confusion, poor research design, and fraud in science (1-4). If each contributor to the literature published new and substantive knowledge, one might agree with the counterargument that the scientific literature is growing appropriately in proportion to a rising number of scientists (5) and accept the literature glut with resignation. Much of today's research, however, is done by teams, which has led to a progressive increase in multiauthored papers (6). Because the convention in biomedical research holds that the first or last authors are
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
STOSSEL TP. Volume: Papers and Academic Promotion. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:146–149. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-146
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(1):146-149.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only