ROBERT B. SHUMAN, M.D.; DANIEL P. SCHUSTER, M.D.; GARY R. ZUCKERMAN, D.O.
Grant support: in part by training grant AM07130 from the National Institutes of Health.
▸Requests for reprints should be addressed to Gary R. Zuckerman, D.O.; Washington University School of Medicine, Digestive Disease Clinical Center, 4949 Barnes Hospital Plaza; St. Louis, MO 63110.
SHUMAN R., SCHUSTER D., ZUCKERMAN G.; Prophylactic Therapy for Stress Ulcer Bleeding: A Reappraisal. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:562-567. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-562
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(4):562-567.
The combined data from 16 prospective trials (2133 patients) appear to suggest that antacids prevent stress ulcer bleeding more effectively than does cimetidine. However, the use of occult blood detection methods to diagnose stress ulcer bleeding may have led to the recognition of clinically insignificant bleeding. When the data from these trials are categorized according to the criteria used for the diagnoses of bleeding (either occult blood detection or clinically overt bleeding), there was no significant difference between antacids and cimetidine in the prevention of overt bleeding (3.3% of 458 compared with 2.7% of 402 patients who bled, respectively; p = 0.69). In addition, both agents were more effective (p < 0.001) than placebo (15% of 720 patients who bled) in the prevention of overt bleeding. Cimetidine and antacids are equal in preventing significant stress ulcer bleeding.
to gain full access to the content and tools.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Peptic Disease, Peptic Ulcer.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only