SAMUEL NEFF, M.D.
NEFF S. Meta-Analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:791. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-5-791_1
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1987;107(5):791.
To the editor: Readers of Douglas Hofstadter (1), logicians, and others will be amused by the publication of an analysis of meta-analysis, a meta-meta-analysis (2, 3). This letter, a commentary on those papers, is therefore an example of meta-meta-meta-analysis. As the previous authors point out, at each higher level new biases are introduced: publication bias and selection bias for the source studies, and publication bias for the meta-analysis itself (positive or "interesting" meta-analyses may be preferentially published).
It seems agreed that the need for meta-analysis has been created by the proliferation of studies that disagree, by sample sizes that are
to gain full access to the content and tools.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only