Steven N. Goodman, MD, MHS, PhD
This issue includes a meta-analysis of the use of steroids in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1). Meta-analyses such as this one command our attention, both because they purport to provide a "definitive" answer to a clinical question that has eluded other researchers and because the work of those researchers, the grist for the meta-analytic mill, is often subject to embarrassingly intense scrutiny. They represent a new class of article, one that straddles the traditional boundaries between original research and review articles. Because meta-analysis is a relatively new and partially technical method, many physicians find themselves unable to appreciate the
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Goodman SN. Have You Ever Meta-Analysis You Didn't Like?. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:244–246. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-3-244
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(3):244-246.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only