Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD; Philip S. Wells, MD; Clive Kearon, MB; David Anderson, MD; Mark Crowther, MD; Jeffrey I. Weitz, MD; Janis Bormanis, MD; Patrick Brill-Edwards, MD; Alexander G. Turpie, MB; Betsy MacKinnon, MSc; Michael Gent, DSc; Jack Hirsh, MD
Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Kearon C, Anderson D, Crowther M, Weitz JI, et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of a Rapid Whole-Blood Assay for D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:1006-1011. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00003
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(12):1006-1011.
Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism often have nondiagnostic lung scans and may present in circumstances where lung scanning is unavailable. Levels of d-dimer, a fibrin-specific product, are increased in patients with acute thrombosis; this may simplify the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a whole-blood d-dimer assay in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and in subgroups of patients with low pretest probability of pulmonary embolism or nondiagnostic lung scans.
Four tertiary care hospitals.
1177 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
All patients underwent an assessment of pretest probability by use of a standardized clinical model, a d-dimer assay, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning, and bilateral compression ultrasonography. Patients in whom pulmonary embolism was not initially diagnosed were followed for 3 months. Accordingly, patients were categorized as positive or negative for pulmonary embolism.
Of the 1177 patients, 197 (17%) were classified as positive for pulmonary embolism. Overall, the d-dimer assay showed a sensitivity of 84.8% and a specificity of 68.4%. In 703 patients (3.4%) with a low pretest probability of pulmonary embolism, the likelihood ratio associated with a negative d-dimer test result was 0.27, resulting in a posterior probability of 1.0% (95% CI, 0.3% to 2.2%). In 698 patients with nondiagnostic lung scans (previous probability, 7.4%), the likelihood ratio associated with a negative d-dimer test result was 0.36, resulting in a posterior probability of 2.8% (CI, 1.4% to 4.8%).
A normal d-dimer test result is useful in excluding pulmonary embolism in patients with a low pretest probability of pulmonary embolism or a nondiagnostic lung scan.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary Embolism, Pulmonary/Critical Care, Venous Thromboembolism.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only