Marcus Müllner, MD; Hugh Matthews, BSc, MBBS; Douglas G. Altman, DSc
Müllner M, Matthews H, Altman DG. Reporting on Statistical Methods To Adjust for Confounding: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:122-126. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00009
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(2):122-126.
The use of complex statistical models to adjust for confounding is common in medical research.
To determine the frequency and adequacy of adjustment for confounding in medical articles.
34 scientific medical journals with a high impact factor.
Frequency of reporting on methods used to adjust for confounding in 537 original research articles published in January 1998.
Of the 537 articles, 169 specified that adjustment for confounding was used. In 1 paper in 10, it was unclear which statistical method was used or for which variables adjustment was made. In 45% of papers, it was not clear how multicategory or continuous variables were treated in the analysis. Inadequate reporting was less frequent if an author was affiliated with a department of statistics, epidemiology, or public health and if articles were published in journals with a high impact factor.
Details of methods used to adjust for confounding are frequently not reported in original research articles.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Cardiology, Coronary Risk Factors, Dyslipidemia, Emergency Medicine, Gastroenterology/Hepatology.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only