Karen E. Adams, MD; Michael H. Cohen, JD, MBA, MFA; David Eisenberg, MD; Albert R. Jonsen, PhD
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the two patients who allowed us to share their stories, Debbie Mosley for invaluable technical assistance, and Martin Donohoe for critical comments.
Grant Support: By unrestricted educational grants from the American Specialty Health Plans, San Diego, California; the Medtronic Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and the Friends of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Requests for Single Reprints: Karen E. Adams, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UHNSO, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239; e-mail, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Adams: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UHNSO, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239.
Mr. Cohen and Dr. Eisenberg: Center for Alternative Medicine Research and Education, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215
Dr. Jonsen: University of Washington (Emeritus), 1333 Jones Street, San Francisco, CA 94109.
Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk–benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient's knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient's persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient's core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Adams KE, Cohen MH, Eisenberg D, Jonsen AR. Ethical Considerations of Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies in Conventional Medical Settings. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:660-664. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00010
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(8):660-664.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only