Heidi D. Nelson, MD, MPH; Peggy Nygren, MA; Yasmin McInerney, MD; Jonathan Klein, MD, MPH
Nelson HD, Nygren P, McInerney Y, Klein J. Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:387-396. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00015
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(5):387-396.
Family and intimate partner violence is common in the United States and is often associated with acute and chronic health problems. Although the clinician's role in identification and intervention is considered a professional, ethical, and sometimes legal responsibility, the effectiveness of screening is uncertain.
To examine evidence on the benefits and harms of screening women and elderly adults in health care settings for family and intimate partner violence.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Health & Psychosocial Instruments, AARP Ageline, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, reference lists, and experts.
The authors selected English-language studies that included original data focusing on the performance of screening instruments (14 studies for women, 3 for elderly persons) and the effectiveness of interventions based in health care settings (2 studies for women, none for elderly persons).
Study design, patient samples and settings, methods of assessment or intervention, and outcome measures were extracted, and a set of criteria was applied to evaluate study quality.
No trials of the effectiveness of screening in a health care setting for reducing harm have been published. Several screening instruments have been developed; some have demonstrated fair to good internal consistency and some have been validated with longer instruments, but none have been evaluated against measurable violence or health outcomes. Few intervention studies have been conducted. Existing intervention studies focused on pregnant women, and study limitations restrict their interpretation.
Although the literature on family and intimate partner violence is extensive, few studies provide data on detection and management to guide clinicians.
KQ 1: Does screening for family and intimate partner violence reduce harm and premature death and disability? KQ 2: How well does screening identify current harm or risk for harm from family and intimate partner violence? KQ 3: What are the adverse effects of screening? KQ 4: How well do interventions reduce harm from family and intimate partner violence? KQ 5: What are the adverse effects of intervention? *Including physical trauma (such as fractures, dislocations, brain injury); unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases; mental trauma; and social isolation and its repercussions, such as depression, anxiety, and nightmares.
Appendix Table 1.
Appendix Table 2.
spouse abuse/or domestic violence.mp. or battered woman.mp. [mp = title, abstract, heading word, table of contents, key phrase identifiers]
(screening or identity or early detection).mp.
physicians, family/ or “family physicians”.mp.
primary health care/ or “primary care”.mp.
family practice/or “family practice”.mp.
2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6
1 or 7
From limit 8 to.
spouse abuse/ or domestic violence.mp. or battered women.mp.
((intimate partner or life partner or partner or wife or husband) and (violence or abuse)).mp.
1 or 2
Physicians, Family/ or family physicians.mp.
exp Primary Health Care/ or primary care.mp.
Family Practice/ or family practice.mp.
EMERGENCIES/ or emergency.mp.
exp emergency service, hospital/ or emergency department$.mp.
OBSTETRICS/ or “OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL”/ or obstetrics.mp.
4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10
3 and 11
pc.fs. or prevent$.mp. or intervention.mp. or assessment.mp.
exp counseling/ or counsel$.mp
(patient education or questionnaire$).mp.
interviews/ or interview$.mp.
exp clinical trials/ or clinical trial$.mp.
13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18
12 and 19
From limit 20 to.
from 21 keep 1–151
exp Partner Abuse/ or spouse abuse.mp.
exp Battered Females/
exp Family Violence/ or exp Victimization/ or exp Emotional Abuse/ or battered women.mp.
3 and (women or females).mp.
((intimate partner$ or life partner$ or partner or wife or husband) and (violence or abuse)).mp.
1 or 2 or 4 or 5
exp Family Physicians/ or family physicians.mp.
exp Family Physicians/ or family practice.mp.
exp emergency services/ or emergenc$.mp.
exp OBSTETRICS/ or obstetrics.mp.
exp GYNECOLOGY/ or gynecology.mp.
7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 15. 6 and 14
(prevent$ or intervention or assessment).mp.
exp counseling/ or counsel$.mp.
exp Client Education/ or patient education.mp.
questionnaires/ or questionnaire$.mp.
exp interviews/ or interview$.mp.
exp at risk populations/ or cohort study$.mp.
(domestic violence or family violence).mp.
(elder$ or aged or old or ageing).mp.
(vulnerable or disabled or handicapped).mp.
(2 or 4) and 3
1 or 5
mass screening/ or screening.mp.
questionnaires/ or questionnaire$.tw.
interview/ or interview$.tw.
7 or 8 or 9
6 and 10
From limit 11 to.
from 12 keep 1–1009
((family or domestic) and (abuse or violence)).mp.
(elder$ or old or ageing or aging or aged or geriatric).mp.
2 and 3
1 or 4
(internal medicine or geriatrics or family physicians or family practice).mp.
(primary care or emergency or emergency services).mp.
1 or 4 or 5
GERIATRICS/ or geriatrics.mp.
Internal Medicine/ or internal medicine.mp.
Family Practice/ or family practice.mp
exp Emergency Service, Hospital/ or emergency department.mp.
7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13
6 and 14
From limit 15 to.
exp COUNSELING/ or counseling.mp.
INTERVIEWS/ or interviews.mp.
17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23
16 and 24
from 25 keep 1–129
(elder$ or aged or aging or ageing or old or geriatric).mp.
3 or 4
2 and 5
1 or 6
exp GERIATRICS/ or geriatrics.mp.
internal medicine.mp. or exp Physicians/
exp Family Physicians/ or exp General Practitioners/ or family practice.mp.
exp emergency services/ or emergency$.mp.
8 or 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13
7 and 14
prevention/ or prevent$.mp. or intervention.mp. or assessment.mp.
exp counseling/ or counsel$.mp. or assess$.mp.
exp at risk populations/ or exp cohort analysis/ or cohort stud$.mp.
from 25 keep 1–36
6 or 7
5 and 8
from 9 keep 1–75
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
Adrian A Boyle
August 13, 2004
Screening women for domestic violence
The article by Nelson et al (1) concludes that intervention studies fail to show any benefit for women suffering domestic violence. They have only considered interventions based in health care and have ignored an extensive literature from psychologists, sociologists and criminologists. There are well conducted controlled trials which show some benefit. (2) (3) Women suffering domestic violence do not only present to physicians but are likely to involve the police and voluntary agencies. Considering interventions based only in healthcare alone is artificial, since this is unlikely to represent the experience of the victim. (4) Though including these studies would probably not have changed the overall conclusions of this review, it is important that researchers in this field consider the wider sources of information before making recommendations.
(1) Nelson HD, Nygren P, McInerney Y, Klein J. Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004; 140(5):387-396.
(2) Sullivan CM, Bybee D, I. Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67(1):43-53.
(3) Sherman L, Berk RA. The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review 1984; 49(2):262-272.
(4) Mirrlees-Black C. Domestic violence: findings from a new British crime survey self completion questionnaire. 1-136. 1999. Home Office Publications.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only