Lois Snyder, JD; Richard L. Neubauer, MD; American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee
Pay-for-performance programs are growing, but little evidence exists on their effectiveness or on their potential unintended consequences and effects on the patientâ€“physician relationship. Pay-for-performance has the potential to help improve the quality of care, if it can be aligned with the goals of medical professionalism. Initiatives that provide incentives for a few specific elements of a single disease or condition, however, may neglect the complexity of care for the whole patient, especially the elderly patient with multiple chronic conditions. Such programs could also result in the deselection of patients, â€œplaying to the measuresâ€ rather than focusing on the patient as a whole, and misalignment of perceptions between physicians and patients. The primary focus of the quality movement in health care should not be on â€œpay forâ€ or â€œperformanceâ€ based on limited measures, but rather on the patient. The American College of Physicians hopes to move the pay-for-performance debate forward with a patient-centered focusâ€”one that puts the needs and interests of the patient firstâ€”as these programs evolve.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Snyder L, Neubauer RL, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Pay-for-Performance Principles That Promote Patient-Centered Care: An Ethics Manifesto. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:792-794. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00011
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(11):792-794.
Healthcare Delivery and Policy.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2017 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only