David B. Matchar, MD; Douglas C. McCrory, MD, MHS; Lori A. Orlando, MD, MHS; Manesh R. Patel, MD; Uptal D. Patel, MD; Meenal B. Patwardhan, MD, MHSA; Benjamin Powers, MD; Gregory P. Samsa, PhD; Rebecca N. Gray, DPhil
Matchar DB, McCrory DC, Orlando LA, Patel MR, Patel UD, Patwardhan MB, et al. Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for Treating Essential Hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:16-29. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00189
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(1):16-29.
The relative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for lowering blood pressure is unknown.
To compare the benefits and harms of ACE inhibitors versus ARBs for treating essential hypertension in adults.
MEDLINE (1966 to May 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2006), and selected reference lists were searched for relevant English-language trials. The MEDLINE search was updated to August 2007 to identify head-to-head trials that reported blood pressure outcomes and major cardiovascular events.
61 clinical studies that directly compared ACE inhibitors versus ARBs in adult patients with essential hypertension, reported an outcome of interest, lasted at least 12 weeks, and included at least 20 patients.
A standardized protocol with predefined criteria was used to extract data on study design, interventions, population characteristics, and outcomes; evaluate study quality and applicability; and assess the strength of the body of evidence for key outcomes.
ACE inhibitors and ARBs had similar long-term effects on blood pressure (50 studies; strength of evidence, high). No consistent differential effects were observed for other outcomes (few studies reported long-term outcomes), including death, cardiovascular events, quality of life, rate of single antihypertensive agent use, lipid levels, progression to diabetes, left ventricular mass or function, and kidney disease. Consistent fair- to good-quality evidence showed that ACE inhibitors were associated with a greater risk for cough. There were fewer withdrawals due to adverse events and greater persistence with therapy for ARBs than for ACE inhibitors, although this evidence was not definitive. Patient subgroups for whom ACE inhibitors or ARBs were more effective, associated with fewer adverse events, or better tolerated were not identified.
Few studies involved a representative sample treated in a typical clinical setting over a long duration, treatment protocols had marked heterogeneity, and substantive amounts of data about important outcomes and patient subgroups were missing.
Available evidence shows that ACE inhibitors and ARBs have similar effects on blood pressure control, and that ACE inhibitors have higher rates of cough than ARBs. Data regarding other outcomes are limited.
Are angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) more effective for treating essential hypertension?
This systematic review of trials that directly compared ACE inhibitors and ARBs in adults with essential hypertension found good evidence that the agents had similar long-term effects on blood pressure. There were no consistent differential effects for mortality, cardiovascular events, progression to diabetes, left ventricular function, or kidney disease. Cough was more frequent with ACE inhibitors than ARBs.
Both ACE inhibitors and ARBs have similar effects on blood pressure and may not have differential effects on other clinical outcomes, although ACE inhibitors do cause cough more often than ARBs.
*See Appendix 1. ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker.
The first group is observational studies and the second group is randomized, controlled trials.
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
Other Audio Options: Download MP3
Cardiology, Nephrology, Hypertension, High Value Care, Coronary Risk Factors.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only