Mariska M.G. Leeflang, PhD; Jonathan J. Deeks, PhD; Constantine Gatsonis, PhD; Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, PhD; on behalf of the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group
Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM, on behalf of the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:889-897. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(12):889-897.
More and more systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies are being published, but they can be methodologically challenging. In this paper, the authors present some of the recent developments in the methodology for conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Restrictive electronic search filters are discouraged, as is the use of summary quality scores. Methods for meta-analysis should take into account the paired nature of the estimates and their dependence on threshold. Authors of these reviews are advised to use the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic or the bivariate model for the data analysis. Challenges that remain are the poor reporting of original diagnostic test accuracy studies and difficulties with the interpretation of the results of diagnostic test accuracy research.
Learn more about subscription options.
Register Now for a free account.
Hematology/Oncology, Nephrology, Urological Disorders.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only