Divay Chandra, MD, MSc; Emilio Parisini, MSc, PhD; Dariush Mozaffarian, MD, DrPH
Chandra D, Parisini E, Mozaffarian D. Meta-analysis: Travel and Risk for Venous Thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:180-190. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00129
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):180-190.
The potential risk for travel-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become an important public health concern because of rapid increases in long-distance travel; however, previous studies on this relationship are surprisingly contradictory.
To estimate the risk for VTE in travelers, determine whether a doseâ€“response relationship exists, and identify reasons for the contradictory results of previous studies.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, grey-literature sources, contact with investigators, and reference lists of studies, without language restrictions.
Reports were selected if they investigated the association between travel and VTE for persons who used any mode of transportation and if nontraveling persons were included for comparison.
Data on study and patient characteristics, risk estimates, and quality were independently extracted by 2 investigators. Pooled effect estimates were obtained by using random-effect meta-analysis.
Of 1560 identified abstracts, 14 studies (11 caseâ€“control, 2 cohort, and 1 caseâ€“crossover) met inclusion criteria, including 4055 cases of VTE. Compared with nontravelers, the overall pooled relative risk for VTE in travelers was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7). Significant heterogeneity was present because of the method for selecting control participants (PÂ = 0.008): whether the studies used control participants who had been referred for VTE evaluation or nonreferred control participants. When the studies that used referred control participants were excluded, the pooled relative risk for VTE in travelers was 2.8 (CI, 2.2 to 3.7), without significant heterogeneity. A doseâ€“response relationship was identified, with an 18% higher risk for VTE for each 2-hour increase in duration of travel by any mode (PÂ = 0.010) and a 26% higher risk for every 2 hours of air travel (PÂ = 0.005).
All available studies were from Western countries; generalizability to non-Western populations is expected but needs confirmation.
Travel is associated with a nearly 3-fold higher risk for VTE, with a doseâ€“response relationship of 18% higher risk for each 2-hour increase in travel duration. Heterogeneity in results of previous studies was due to selection bias toward the null from use of referred control participants.
The body of evidence on the epidemiology of long-distance travel and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is heterogeneous and inconclusive.
The reviewers found 14 eligible studies, which had significant between-study heterogeneity, and the pooled relative risk for VTE was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7). The reviewers eliminated the heterogeneity by excluding 6 case–control studies in which control participants had been referred for VTE testing. The relative risk was 2.8 (CI, 2.2 to 3.7) in the remaining included studies and 1.2 (CI, 0.9 to 1.6) in the excluded studies.
By excluding studies with control participants who had a different risk for VTE than the source population for the case patients, the authors clarified a confusing body of evidence.
VTE = venous thromboembolism.
The 14th study included in the meta-analysis was unpublished. The plot shows mild asymmetry, with more negative studies being published than positive ones. We obtained the P value by using the Begg test.
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2016 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only