Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Summaries for Patients |7 May 2002

Ways To Deliver Preventive Health Care

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
  • The summary below is from the full report titled “Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis.” It is in the 7 May 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 641-651). The authors are EG Stone, SC Morton, ME Hulscher, MA Maglione, EA Roth, JM Grimshaw, BS Mittman, LV Rubenstein, LZ Rubenstein, and PG Shekelle.


Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.
×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
    • Why did the researchers do this particular study?
    • Who was studied?
    • How was the study done?
    • What did the researchers find?
    • What were the limitations of the study?
    • What are the implications of the study?
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link
  • CiteULike Link

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

The goal of preventive health care is to prevent illness and cancer. There are several proven effective preventive health care practices for adults. For example, vaccination helps prevent influenza virus (the flu) and certain kinds of pneumonia in older adults. Screening tests, such as Papanicolaou (Pap) smears (examination of cells scraped from the cervix), mammography (breast x-ray), and colon examinations with scopes, help find early cancers or precursors of cancers before symptoms develop. Although experts recommend all of these preventive health care practices, studies show that many adults do not receive them. Doctors and health care organizations may not use effective ways to be sure that patients get preventive services.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

The researchers wanted to identify effective ways to improve the delivery of common preventive care services (vaccination and cancer screening).

Who was studied?

The study included hundreds of patients who had participated in studies comparing different ways of improving preventive care practices.

How was the study done?

Instead of doing a new study, the researchers analyzed information from 81 studies that had compared different approaches for providing preventive services (vaccination and cancer screening). The researchers categorized approaches into seven areas: reminders, education, provider feedback about past performance, financial incentives, regulatory actions, mass media campaigns, and organizational change. Organizational change was defined as changing a health care system to improve performance of preventive services. The researchers then used special statistical analyses (meta-regression) to see which types of approaches were most effective.

What did the researchers find?

Organizational change was the most effective approach. Changes included having separate clinics just for prevention, scheduling specific clinic visits just for prevention, and using staff other than doctors for prevention activities. The next most effective approaches were patient financial incentives (such as reduction of copayment amounts), reminders to use a service, and patient education. Approaches aimed at providers were less effective. Using several approaches appeared to be better than relying on just one.

What were the limitations of the study?

The costs and resources needed to implement the different approaches were not described. The effectiveness of some approaches was difficult to assess because the research was poorly done.

What are the implications of the study?

Organizational changes, such as separate clinics, planned visits, and special staff, are the most effective way to improve adult immunization (vaccination) and cancer screening. Lowering the consumer cost for preventive services by decreasing or eliminating consumer cost-sharing will also be effective.

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Ways To Deliver Preventive Health Care. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:I–16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00001

Download citation file:

  • RIS (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2018

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):I-16.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00001

©
2002 American College of Physicians
0 Citations

See Also

Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

Putting Prevention into Practice: The Community's Role
Annals of Internal Medicine; 130 (4_Part_1): 336
Should We Abandon Routine Visits? There Is Little Evidence for or Against
Annals of Internal Medicine; 164 (7): 498-499
Live Attenuated Versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Hutterite Children: A Cluster Randomized Blinded Trial
Annals of Internal Medicine; 165 (9): 617-624
In older adults, high- vs standard-dose influenza vaccine reduced laboratory-confirmed influenza
Annals of Internal Medicine; 162 (2): JC2
View MoreView Less

Journal Club

In older adults, high- vs standard-dose influenza vaccine reduced laboratory-confirmed influenza
Annals of Internal Medicine; 162 (2): JC2
Review: Influenza vaccine reduces influenza-like illness in healthy adults
Annals of Internal Medicine; 161 (6): JC6
Review: Self-collected samples are less accurate for HPV testing than clinician-collected samples
Annals of Internal Medicine; 161 (4): JC11
HPV vaccination reduced cytologic abnormalities compared with control vaccination in young women
Annals of Internal Medicine; 159 (12): JC4
View MoreView Less

Related Point of Care

Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Annals of Internal Medicine; 160 (9): ITC5-1
Influenza
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (5): ITC33-ITC48
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Annals of Internal Medicine; 163 (7): ITC1
Influenza
Annals of Internal Medicine; 151 (9): ITC5-1
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Cancer Screening/Prevention
Healthcare Delivery and Policy
Hematology/Oncology
Infectious Disease
Prevention/Screening

Cancer Screening/Prevention, Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Hematology/Oncology, Infectious Disease, Prevention/Screening.

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Online First RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards

  • Personae Photography Prize
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×