Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Letters |20 April 2010

Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer Free

Victoria L. Seewaldt, MD

Victoria L. Seewaldt, MD

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
Potential Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
  • From Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
      1. References
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link
  • CiteULike Link
TO THE EDITOR:
The USPSTF (1) recently recommended against routine mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 years. The recommendation was based on the relative probability of unscreened women dying of breast cancer and the reduction in mortality provided by mammographic screening. On the basis of these studies, the USPSTF issued a blanket recommendation against routine screening mammography in all women aged 40 to 49 years.
The USPSTF study lacks evidence to support a reduction in mammography screening in African-American and Latino women who are younger than 50 years (1). The USPSTF study analyzed the risk–benefit ratio of mammography as a function of a woman's age but did not consider the potential contributions of race and ethnicity (1). Investigators did not state the racial and ethnic composition of study participants and did not analyze the risk–benefit ratio of mammography in African-American and Latino women (1). It is concerning that the USPSTF issued a one-size-fits-all recommendation on breast cancer screening without considering whether the recommendation is appropriate for all women.
Our current recommendations for mammography screening are based on studies in European, European-Canadian, and European-American women. Eight randomized trials (2) studied the effectiveness of mammography in the United States, Sweden, Canada, and the United Kingdom. These studies balance the relative contributions of mammographic density (sensitivity and specificity of mammography) and the mortality rate from breast cancer (2). To our knowledge, there has been no large-scale analysis of the effectiveness of mammographic screening in African-American and Latino women.
Studies of mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 years are complex because younger women have a lower incidence of breast cancer; denser breast tissue (which can lower sensitivity); and on average, faster growing, biologically aggressive cancer. Relative to European-American women, African-American women have lower breast density, faster-growing cancer, and a higher likelihood of dying to breast cancer (3–5). Because the mortality rate from breast cancer in African-American women is higher and mammographic density is typically lower, the benefit from mammography screening is probably higher in African-American and perhaps Latino women than in European-American women. So where is the evidence to recommend against routine mammography screening of African-American and Latino women younger than 50 years?
We agree with the USPSTF that change is needed. But the change we call for is the end of one-size-fits-all recommendations and the inclusion of African-American and Latino women in clinical trials testing the benefit of mammographic screening.
Victoria L. Seewaldt, MD
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708

References

  1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
    Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    Ann Intern Med
    2009
    151
    PubMed
  2. Elmore
    JG
    Armstrong
    K
    Lehman
    CD
    Fletcher
    SW
    Screening for breast cancer.
    JAMA
    2005
    293
    1245
    56
    PubMed
    CrossRef
  3. Stuedal
    A
    Ma
    H
    Bernstein
    L
    Pike
    MC
    Ursin
    G
    Does breast size modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk?
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
    2008
    17
    621
    7
    PubMed
  4. Ursin
    G
    Ma
    H
    Wu
    AH
    Bernstein
    L
    Salane
    M
    Parisky
    YR
    et al.
    Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
    2003
    12
    332
    8
    PubMed
  5. Elledge
    RM
    Clark
    GM
    Chamness
    GC
    Osborne
    CK
    Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States.
    J Natl Cancer Inst
    1994
    86
    705
    12
    PubMed

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Seewaldt VL. Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:541–542. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00205

Download citation file:

  • RIS (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2018

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(8):541-542.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00205

4 Citations

See Also

Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
When Evidence Collides With Anecdote, Politics, and Emotion: Breast Cancer Screening
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
Comments and Response on the USPSTF Recommendation on Screening for Breast Cancer
View MoreView Less
CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Online First RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards

  • Personae Photography Prize
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×