0
Summaries for Patients |

Screening Smarter, Not Harder, for Prostate Cancer FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The full report is titled “Comparative Effectiveness of Alternative Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies. Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms.” It is in the 5 February 2013 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 158, pages 145-153). The authors are R. Gulati, J.L. Gore, and R. Etzioni.


Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.


Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):I-30. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00001
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non–skin cancer among U.S. men. It can be life-threatening, and many men have cancer without knowing it. For those reasons, doctors sometimes look for prostate cancer in healthy men (screen for cancer) by measuring blood levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a protein secreted by the prostate gland. High PSA levels can be caused by cancer and may lead a doctor to take a sample of prostate tissue to see whether cancer is present (biopsy). Most prostate cancer grows very slowly, however, and many men with prostate cancer die of other causes. Neither PSA testing nor prostate biopsy tells doctors with certainty which cases of prostate cancer are threatening and which require treatment. As a result, many men with slow-growing cancer have biopsies and treatment after PSA testing that they would not have needed if doctors had never tested. For that reason, a group of experts recently recommended against prostate cancer screening with PSA testing. They concluded that men are hurt more than they are helped by the test. Their recommendation was based on standard practice, where men are tested every year and referred for biopsy and treatment at certain PSA levels. It is possible that using the PSA test differently (for example, by testing less often) would still be useful but reduce the harms of unnecessary treatment that come from more frequent testing.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see whether there are ways of using PSA testing to “screen smarter, not harder,” for prostate cancer and reduce the harms of current PSA testing.

Who was studied?

This study did not involve real people. Instead, it fed information from many research studies and sources into a computer model.

How was the study done?

The researchers used the computer model to understand how 35 ways of using the PSA test may affect patients. The model calculated the number of men whose lives would be saved and the number of PSA results that would lead to unnecessary prostate biopsy if men started or stopped screening at different ages, were screened more or less frequently, or had biopsies at different PSA levels.

What did the researchers find?

Several ways of using the PSA test helped men while reducing the harms of testing. One way was stopping screening at age 70 years because men older than 70 years tend to have higher PSA levels without prostate cancer, or if they have cancer, it is slow-growing. Other ways included measuring PSA levels less frequently in men whose levels are normal when first measured and requiring that older men have higher levels before they go for biopsy and possible unnecessary treatment.

What were the limitations of the study?

The study relied on a computer model that used real patient information but did not directly observe the results of the screening strategies. The study did not incorporate any measure of men's preferences (for example, finding cancer early or avoiding unnecessary testing or treatment).

What are the implications of the study?

There may be ways to “screen smarter” for prostate cancer with PSA testing, which probably require using the PSA test less often and recommending that some men with high PSA values avoid biopsy. Those changes may lead to a few missed cases of prostate cancer but would benefit far more men than they hurt by avoiding unnecessary testing and treatment that results from more intensive use of the PSA test.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)