0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Does the Net Reclassification Improvement Help Us Evaluate Models and Markers?

Andrew J. Vickers, PhD; and Margaret Pepe, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

Grant Support: In part by funds from David H. Koch provided through the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, and SPORE grant P50-CA92629 from the National Cancer Institute to Dr. Howard Scher. This work was also supported in part by a National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center under award P30 CA00874 and by grant R01CA152089 from the National Institutes of Health.

Potential Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M13-2841.

Requests for Single Reprints: Andrew J. Vickers, PhD, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 East 63rd Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10021; e-mail, vickersa@mskcc.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Vickers: Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 307 East 63rd Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10021.

Dr. Pepe: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024.


Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(2):136-137. doi:10.7326/M13-2841
Text Size: A A A

In this issue, Leening and colleagues discuss limitations and controversies surrounding the NRI and propose a systematic approach for presenting NRI analysis. The editorialists recommend that researchers exercise caution when using the NRI and consider statistical methods that allow for presenting results in more straightforward clinical terms.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)