Summaries for Patients |

Comparison of Two Forms of the Anticlotting Drug Heparin for Treatment of Blood Clots in the Legs FREE

[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Once or Twice Daily Compared with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Disease.” It is in the 6 February 2001 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 134, pages 191-202). The authors are G Merli, TE Spiro, C-G Olsson, U Abildgaard, BL Davidson, A Eldor, D Elias, A Grigg, D Musset, GM Rodgers, AA Trowbridge, RD Yusen, and K Zawilska, for the Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(3):S76. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-3-200102060-00005
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a condition in which blood clots form in the large leg veins, causing pain and swelling. It is important to treat DVT because clots can break off and travel through the bloodstream to the lungs, a potentially deadly condition called pulmonary embolism. DVT is most commonly treated with blood thinners, usually starting with standard heparin given intravenously (through a small tube inserted into a vein) for 5 to 10 days, followed by warfarin, a pill that is generally taken for at least 3 months. A new type of blood thinner called low-molecular-weight heparin has recently become available. Treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin is more convenient since it can simply be injected under the skin once or twice a day. In addition, unlike patients receiving standard heparin, patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin do not need frequent blood tests to guide dose changes. Several studies have suggested that low-molecular-weight heparin is an effective treatment for DVT. However, those studies were small, did not include patients who had DVT plus pulmonary embolism, and used two injections per day rather than one.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To find out whether once-a-day injections of enoxaparin (a particular type of low-molecular-weight heparin) were as effective in the treatment of DVT (with or without pulmonary embolism) as intravenous heparin or twice-a-day injections of enoxaparin.

Who was studied?

The study included 900 patients with DVT cared for at 74 hospitals in 16 countries. Of the 900 patients, 287 also had pulmonary embolism.

How was the study done?

As soon as DVT was diagnosed, patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard heparin intravenously, two 1-milligram injections of enoxaparin per day, or one 1.5-milligram injection of enoxaparin per day. Patients also began taking oral blood thinners within 72 hours of entering the study.

What did the researchers find?

Symptoms of DVT returned with equal frequency in the three treatment groups; no difference was noted in the frequency of bleeding complications with the three types of treatment.

What were the limitations of the study?

Some patients with DVT would have been too sick to be eligible for the study, so it is unclear whether these results would apply to all patients with this condition. Of the 900 patients, only 740 completed enough of the study to be included in the analysis.

What are the implications of the study?

In the treatment of DVT (with or without pulmonary embolism), injection of enoxaparin once or twice daily appears to be as effective as intravenous heparin and does not cause more bleeding complications.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.