0
Sign In  | Subscribe
19 June 2001, Vol 134, No. 12>
Summaries for Patients | 19 June 2001

How Willing Are Doctors To Give Patients with Terminal Cancer Accurate Information about Their Chances of Survival? FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Prognostic Disclosure to Patients with Cancer near the End of Life.” It is in the 19 June 2001 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 134, pages 1096-1105). The authors are EB Lamont and NA Christakis.


Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(12):S13-. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-12-200106190-00004
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Patients with terminal or end-stage cancer sometimes do not understand their actual chances of survival. This misunderstanding can affect their decisions regarding treatments and end-of-life care. Patients may misunderstand their survival chances for several reasons. For example, some patients may continue to believe they will be cured despite being told otherwise. Families may sometimes contribute to patients' misunderstandings by hiding or downplaying negative information. Moreover, doctors may not discuss survival chances with patients, or they may give patients inaccurate information. Few studies have investigated doctors' willingness to give terminally ill patients information about their chances of survival.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To find out how often physicians would willingly give patients with terminal cancer their best estimates of how long the patients are likely to survive.

Who was studied?

The study included 258 physicians who cared for 326 patients with terminal cancer. Physicians included generalists (internists and family practitioners), oncologists (specialists in cancer), gynecologists, and surgeons. Eighty percent of the physicians were men.

How was the study done?

The researchers asked the physicians to estimate the chances of survival for each of their 326 patients. The physicians were also asked what they would tell these patients if either the patient or a family member insisted on receiving a specific estimate of survival. The researchers then compared the physicians' estimates of survival with what the physicians said they would actually tell their patients.

What did the researchers find?

Physicians said they would withhold information altogether about survival estimates from 23% of their patients. They said they would tell 37% of their patients their actual survival estimates and would give survival estimates different from the ones they actually estimated to 40% of their patients. In these latter instances, physicians most often said they would give patients estimates that were longer than their actual estimates. Physicians said they would more often have frank discussions with older than younger patients. Female physicians and physicians who had treated many patients with terminal cancer were least likely to favor frank discussions with their patients.

What were the limitations of the study?

This study was based on what physicians said they would do rather than what they actually did; whether their thoughts of what they would do match their actual practice is not known. Also, it is difficult for physicians to make exact estimates of how long individual patients will survive.

What are the implications of the study?

Physicians who care for patients with terminal cancer say that they would often not provide such patients their best estimates of survival. Failing to share that information may contribute to patients' misunderstanding about their chances of survival and may affect their decisions about cancer treatment.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Advertisement

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Proceedings of the 37th ESMO Congress, 28 September–2 October 2012, Vienna, Austria.
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO Issue date: 2012 Sep
Bladder filling variations during concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients: early experience of bladder volume assessment using ultrasound scanner.
Radiation oncology journal Issue date: 2013 Mar

Annals of Internal Medicine

Other Resources

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)