0
Summaries for Patients |

Second Colorectal Cancer in Patients Who Had First Colon Cancer Treated with Surgery and Chemotherapy FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Surveillance for Second Primary Colorectal Cancer after Adjuvant Chemotherapy: An Analysis of Intergroup 0089.” It is in the 19 February 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 261-269). The authors are RJ Green, JP Metlay, K Propert, PJ Catalano, JS Macdonald, RJ Mayer, and DG Haller.


Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(4):I29. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-4-200202190-00001
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Colorectal cancer is cancer of the colon (large intestine) or rectum. Second colorectal cancer can occur in patients after treatment for first colon cancer. For this reason, patients typically have surveillance with periodic colonoscopy after treatment for colon cancer. Colonoscopy involves looking into the rectum and colon through a tube-shaped instrument for precancerous abnormalities or tumors. Current recommendations suggest that patients should have colonoscopy 1 year after treatment; then, if the results of the first colonoscopy are normal, they should have colonoscopy every 3 to 5 years. However, it is not known whether this follow-up is adequate because limited information is available about the frequency and timing of second cancer.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To learn more about the frequency and timing of second colorectal cancer after treatment for first colon cancer.

Who was studied?

3278 patients treated with surgery and chemotherapy for colon cancer that had not spread beyond the intestine or intestinal lymph nodes (stage II and stage III). All of the patients were participating in a large study of chemotherapy that began in 1989.

How was the study done?

The researchers collected information about patients every 3 months for the first year, then every 6 months for 4 years, and then every year until death or the end of the study. Information collected included whether any surveillance procedures were done and whether second colorectal cancer was detected. The researchers then compared the rates of second colorectal cancer in study patients with the rates of first colorectal cancer in two comparison groups: 1) the general U.S. population during the same time period and 2) patients who participated in the National Polyp Study, a large study to see whether frequent colonoscopy and removal of any polyps found decreased colorectal cancer.

What did the researchers find?

Despite surveillance, the rate of second cancer after treatment for first colon cancer was higher than the cancer rates in the two comparison populations. In addition, patients' cancer was diagnosed during a relatively short period after their most recent colonoscopy.

What were the limitations of the study?

While this study shows that the rates of second colon cancer are higher in the patients studied than in the comparison groups, it does not prove that more frequent colonoscopy would result in better patient outcomes.

What are the implications of the study?

Despite surveillance, the rates of second colorectal cancer in patients who have had treatment for first colon cancer are high. This information will be useful in developing better strategies to reduce the rates of second cancer and associated rates of death.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)