0
Sign In  | Subscribe
5 February 2008, Vol 148, No. 3>
Summaries for Patients | 5 February 2008

The Effect of Medicare Part D on Drug Utilization and Expenditures FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “The Effect of the Medicare Part D Prescription Benefit on Drug Utilization and Expenditures.” It is in the 5 February 2008 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 148, pages 169-177). The authors are W. Yin, A. Basu, J.X. Zhang, A. Rabbani, D.O. Meltzer, and G.C. Alexander.


Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(3):I-14. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00201
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

In January 2006, the U.S. government began helping to pay for medicines taken by older people. The program, called Medicare Part D, is popular. However, it is not clear to what extent the program is saving people money or allowing them to obtain drugs they might not otherwise be able to afford.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see what effect the new drug benefit has had on the amount that older people pay for their drugs and the number of pills they get from the pharmacy.

Who was studied?

117,648 adults between 66 and 79 years of age who filled at least 1 prescription at Walgreens in both 2005 and 2006.

How was the study done?

The researchers used information from the 16 months before and after the Medicare Part D program started to estimate how much money people would have spent on their medicines, and how many pills they would have received, if the program never existed. Then, to estimate the effect of the program, they compared peoples' actual expenses and pills received with the predictions of what would have happened if Part D had never existed.

What did the researchers find?

Before the enrollment deadline of 30 April 2006, the program saved people who enrolled in it about $8 a month and gave them an extra 5 to 6 days of pills, on average. After the enrollment deadline, the program saved enrollees about $9 a month and gave them an extra 14 days of pills, on average. Medicare beneficiaries who did not enroll in Part D saw smaller changes in out-of-pocket expenditures and prescription use.

What were the limitations of the study?

The information comes from only a small sample of people who used 1 pharmacy. In addition, the study does not tell us whether Medicare Part D led to any important changes in people's actual health.

What are the implications of the study?

Medicare Part D appears to have led to modest savings and modest increases in drug use by older people. More research is needed to see whether these effects have any influence on people's health.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Advertisement

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Orals in the Bundle: A Policy Framework.
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN Issue date: 2013 Apr 18
Association of Medicare Part D Medication Out-of-Pocket Costs with Utilization of Statin Medications.
Health services research Issue date: 2012 Dec 26

Annals of Internal Medicine

Other Resources

Copyright © 2013 The American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Buy This Article

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Register Now for a free account
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)