0
Summaries for Patients |

Comparison of 3 Strategies to Quit Smoking FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Effect of Varying Levels of Disease Management on Smoking Cessation. A Randomized Trial.” It is in the 7 April 2009 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 150, pages 437-446). The authors are E.F. Ellerbeck, J.D. Mahnken, A.P. Cupertino, L.S. Cox, K.A. Greiner, L.M. Mussulman, N. Nazir, T.I. Shireman, K. Resnicow, and J.S. Ahluwalia.


Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):I-36. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00001
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Cigarette smoking is a chronic problem. Many smokers want to quit but find that doing so is difficult. Quitting smoking may require repeated or intensive interventions. Smoking cessation aids include counseling and various drugs. Some studies show that smokers who use more than 1 aid increase their chances of quitting and remaining smoke-free. Few studies, however, examine whether repeated intensive interventions increase long-term cessation rates more than repeated, less intensive interventions.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To compare 3 strategies of varying intensity to help smokers quit smoking.

Who was studied?

750 adults recruited from 50 rural primary care practices in Kansas. All smoked 10 or more cigarettes daily and had been smoking for at least 1 year.

How was the study done?

Patients were randomly assigned to drug therapy alone or drug therapy combined with either moderate- or high-intensity disease management. Drug therapy consisted of either a 6-week course of a nicotine patch (21 mg daily) or a 7-week course of sustained-release bupropion (150 mg twice daily). Counselors provided disease management that included up to 2 (moderate-intensity disease management) or 6 (high-intensity disease management) telephone calls with patients and reports to patients' physicians. The interventions were offered 4 times (every 6 months for 2 years). Throughout the study, the researchers assessed patients' requests for drug therapy and patients' reports of smoking cessation.

What did the researchers find?

The percentages of patients who requested drug prescriptions during the first, second, third, and fourth intervention cycles were 64%, 41%, 24%, and 25%, respectively. The percentages of patients assigned to either the moderate- or high-intensity disease management group that had at least 1 counseling session during the first and fourth intervention cycles were about 90% and 55% to 60%.

Smoking cessation rates after the first cycle were 11% for the group that received drug therapy alone, 15% for the moderate-intensity disease management group, and 17% for the high-intensity disease management group. Smoking cessation rates at 2 years for the 3 groups were 23%, 24%, and 28%, respectively.

What were the limitations of the study?

Drug therapy was provided for free. Smoking abstinence was self-reported. Some patients (20% to 30%) did not complete follow-up assessments.

What are the implications of the study?

Smoking cessation rates may increase with repeated assistance for quit attempts. An optimum combination and intensity of interventions that maximizes long-term cessation remains unclear.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)