The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Reviews |

Systematic Review: Diagnostic Procedures to Differentiate Unilateral From Bilateral Adrenal Abnormality in Primary Aldosteronism

Marlies J.E. Kempers, MD, PhD; Jacques W.M. Lenders, MD, PhD; Lieke van Outheusden, MSc; Gert Jan van der Wilt, PhD; Leo J. Schultze Kool, MD, PhD; Ad R.M.M. Hermus, MD, PhD; and Jaap Deinum, MD, PhD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Acknowledgment: The authors thank the authors of previous articles who provided us with additional information.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Jaap Deinum, MD, PhD, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands; e-mail, j.deinum@aig.umcn.nl.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Kempers, Lenders, van der Wilt, Schultze Kool, Hermus, and Deinum and Ms. Outheusden: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(5):329-337. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00007
Text Size: A A A

Background: Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adrenal vein sampling (AVS) are used to distinguish unilateral from bilateral increased aldosterone secretion as a cause of primary aldosteronism. This distinction is crucial because unilateral primary aldosteronism can be treated surgically, whereas bilateral primary aldosteronism should be treated medically.

Purpose: To determine the proportion of patients with primary aldosteronism whose CT or MRI results with regard to unilateral or bilateral adrenal abnormality agreed or did not agree with those of AVS.

Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, 1977 to April 2009.

Study Selection: Studies describing adults with primary aldosteronism who underwent CT/MRI and AVS were included. Of 472 initially identified studies, 38 met the selection criteria; extractable data were available for 950 patients.

Data Extraction: The CT/MRI result was considered accurate when AVS showed unilaterally increased aldosterone secretion on the same side as the abnormality seen on CT/MRI or when AVS showed symmetric aldosterone secretion and CT/MRI revealed bilateral or no unilateral abnormality.

Data Synthesis: In 37.8% of patients (359 of 950), CT/MRI results did not agree with AVS results. If only CT/MRI results had been used to determine lateralization of an adrenal abnormality, inappropriate adrenalectomy would have occurred in 14.6% of patients (where AVS showed a bilateral problem), inappropriate exclusion from adrenalectomy would have occurred in 19.1% (where AVS showed unilateral secretion), and adrenalectomy on the wrong side would have occurred in 3.9% (where AVS showed aldosterone secretion on the opposite side).

Limitation: The lack of follow-up data in the included articles made it impossible to confirm that adrenalectomies were performed appropriately.

Conclusion: When AVS is used as the criterion standard test for diagnosing laterality of aldosterone secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism, CT/MRI misdiagnosed the cause of primary aldosteronism in 37.8% of patients. Relying only on CT/MRI may lead to inappropriate treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism.


Grahic Jump Location
Study flow diagram.

Details of excluded references are available on request. AVS = adrenal vein sampling; CT = computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

Grahic Jump Location




CME Activities are only available to ACP members and Individual Annals subscribers. If you are a member or a subscriber please sign in. Otherwise please become a member or subscribe to Annals.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Journal Club
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.