The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Research and Reporting Methods |

Distinguishing Case Series From Cohort Studies

Olaf M. Dekkers, MD, PhD, MA, MSc; Matthias Egger, MD, MSc; Douglas G. Altman, DSc; and Jan P. Vandenbroucke, MD, PhD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and Center for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Acknowledgment: The authors thank Geert van der Heijden for his critical discussion of our article.

Potential Conflicts of Interest: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M11-1544.

Requests for Single Reprints: Olaf M. Dekkers, MD, PhD, MA, MSc, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; e-mail, o.m.dekkers@lumc.nl.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Dekkers and Vandenbroucke: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.

Dr. Egger: University of Bern, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.

Dr. Altman: Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Wolfson College Annexe, Linton Road, Oxford OX2 6UD, United Kingdom.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: O.M. Dekkers, M. Egger, D.G. Altman, J.P. Vandenbroucke.

Drafting of the article: O.M. Dekkers, M. Egger, D.G. Altman, J.P. Vandenbroucke.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: O.M. Dekkers, M. Egger, D.G. Altman, J.P. Vandenbroucke.

Final approval of the article: O.M. Dekkers, M. Egger, D.G. Altman, J.P. Vandenbroucke.

Statistical expertise: D.G. Altman.

Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1_Part_1):37-40. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00006
Text Size: A A A

Case series are a commonly reported study design, but the label “case series” is used inconsistently and sometimes incorrectly. Mislabeling impairs the appropriate indexing and sorting of evidence.

This article tries to clarify the concept of case series and proposes a way to distinguish them from cohort studies. In a cohort study, patients are sampled on the basis of exposure and are followed over time, and the occurrence of outcomes is assessed. A cohort study may include a comparison group, although this is not a necessary feature. A case series may be a study that samples patients with both a specific outcome and a specific exposure, or one that samples patients with a specific outcome and includes patients regardless of whether they have specific exposures. Whereas a cohort study, in principle, enables the calculation of an absolute risk or a rate for the outcome, such a calculation is not possible in a case series.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
What about analytic or descriptive studies? The cohort studies as proposed here, are not necessary analytic anymore
Posted on June 19, 2015
Cristian Baicus
University of Medicine Bucharest, Colentina Chair of Internal Medicine and Research Methodology
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
In the classical description of studies, case series belonged to the descriptive epidemiology, while the cohort studies were analytic. Because case series had not a compasion group inside the study, no exposure/effect relationships could have been searched for. The cohort study as proposed here, without a compulsory control cohort, could not allow to comparison, and therefore to analytic epidemiology, but only to description (absolute risc=incidence rate is only descriptive epidemiology), and therefore the cohort studies could be in this case both analytical, or only descriptive, which could introduce more confusion (the same is already possible with cross-sectional studies, which belong to descriptive epidemiology, but which permit the calculation of a measure of association = the rate of prevalences, or the OR, depending on the textbook one reads).
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.