0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Ideas and Opinions |

Consent for Research With Biological Samples: One-Time General Consent Versus a Gift Model

David Wendler, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. government. The National Institutes of Health had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Acknowledgment: The author thanks Sara Hull for her comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Financial Support: This work was completed as part of the author's official duties as an employee of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

Potential Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M11-2688.

Requests for Single Reprints: David Wendler, PhD, Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156; e-mail, mailto:dwendler@nih.gov.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: D. Wendler.

Drafting of the article: D. Wendler.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: D. Wendler.

Final approval of the article: D. Wendler.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: D. Wendler.


Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(8):596-598. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00011
Text Size: A A A

Scientific advances have dramatically increased the value of stored human biological samples, generating debate about the appropriate consent process for these samples for research not specified at the time of sample collection. The recent Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking raises the possibility of incorporating one-time general consent into U.S. federal regulations governing research with human biological samples. Some have proposed that a gift model may be more appropriate. This commentary compares how well each model addresses 5 central challenges faced by investigators and concludes that one-time general consent is preferred.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Consent makes the law (Consensus facit legem)
Posted on April 23, 2012
Hugh, Mann, Physician
Eagle Rock, Mo 65641
Conflict of Interest: None Declared

Informed consent is a redundancy, because being properly informed is a precondition of consent. Without being properly informed, a patient or client cannot give any legitimate, binding consent. Therefore, it is imperative that all professionals withhold any request for agreement or signatures, until after all information and questions have been fully addressed.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)