The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
On Being a Doctor |

A Balancing Act

Jennifer Adams, MD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

From Denver Health and Hospital Authority and the University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80204.

Note: Patient name and some details of the case have been changed to protect confidentiality.

Acknowledgment: The author thanks Ingrid Binswanger, MD, MPH, and John Steiner, MD, for their help with preparation of the manuscript.

Requests for Single Reprints: Jennifer Adams, MD, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, 1100 Federal Boulevard, MC 3000, Denver, CO 80204; e-mail, jennifer.adams@dhha.org.

Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(3):215-216. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00015
Text Size: A A A

There is no objective decision aid, instrument, or measure that can help me balance the benefits of prescribing opioids to treat pain with the risks I worried about, including tolerance, physiologic dependence, diversion, and overdose.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Acting to the Unbalanced
Posted on August 25, 2012
Neil A Louwrens, MD FACP
Mercy Medical Center Redding
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
Each of us involved in the compassionate and evidence based care of our patients with pain would agree with her statement that ‘this was not the kind of medicine I wanted to practice’. Her report of ‘burn out’ related to the frequency of such patient encounters certainly comes as no surprise. Pain is unfortunately a common problem in our society and little else summons the ‘healer’ more urgently to action than these patients in distress. Harkening this cry, and responding to our ethical obligation, whilst striving ‘to comfort always’, we heed the higher calling to deliver relief. And what a glorious relief these opiates bring. But the constant strategically calculated bombardment for requests of opiates by a growing number of dependents is overwhelming. It is unbelievably draining and perhaps one of the single most significant contributors to compassion fatigue. Unless our profession strategizes a meaningful intervention to this pervasive ill, provider satisfaction will likely continue to fail. Unfortunately industry sponsored ‘education’ on pain management, and a somewhat misguided government-sponsored focus on ‘Quality’, the backbone of value based purchasing, is calling us to satisfy the health care ‘consumer’ (aka patient) at all costs! Professional objective judgment, despite serving our profession soundly for thousands of years, has been relegated to voodoo medicine. We all know that to ‘opiate dependants’ (aka addict) the only ‘valuable’ care worthy of receiving a ‘high’ quality score is a substantial narcotic refill. Nothing else really matters, and certainly NOT the quality of your care! And, as my colleague so poignantly points out, there is ‘no objective decision aid, instrument, or measure’ that assists us on this slippery slope. And the crude ‘fifth vital sign’ is at the heart of this issue is it not? In the setting of opiate dependency a more crude, inaccurate, non-objective and easily manipulated tool you will be hard pressed to find in all of modern society, save for the ‘Disability’ and ‘Workers Compensation’ arenas. And we all know the magnitude of these abuses, yet few have the time or political fortitude to make a stand and enact change. Colleagues, it would be wise for us, as hard as it is, to report the suspected abuses more widely. Our silence and unwillingness to call out such observed patterns are doing a disservice to our colleagues, and to our profession, but ironically most importantly by those who perpetrate these injustices. These dependent patients would be better served by a profession calling things out just as they are, and medico-legal, quality and regulatory systems responsive to our observations.
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Topic Collections
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.