The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Ideas and Opinions |

Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening “Proven Ineffective Care”?Is PSA Screening “Proven Ineffective Care”?

Michael J. Barry, MD; and Peter C. Albertsen, MD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

This article was published at www.annals.org on 23 February 2016.

From Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M15-3025.

Requests for Single Reprints: Michael J. Barry, MD, General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 802, Boston, MA 02114; e-mail, mbarry@mgh.harvard.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Barry: General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 802, Boston, MA 02114.

Dr. Albertsen: Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3955.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: M.J. Barry, P.C. Albertsen.

Drafting of the article: M.J. Barry, P.C. Albertsen.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: P.C. Albertsen.

Final approval of the article: M.J. Barry, P.C. Albertsen.

Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(10):687-688. doi:10.7326/M15-3025
© 2016 American College of Physicians
Text Size: A A A

A recently proposed quality measure, “Non-Recommended PSA-Based Screening,” has generated considerable debate. It would be one of the first U.S. quality metrics to focus on the delivery of too much rather than too little care. The authors discuss their concerns about the proposed measure.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
PSA Screening: The fault dear Brutus lies within us...
Posted on May 17, 2016
Stephen B. Strum, MD, FACP
Medical Oncologist Specializing in Prostate Cancer
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
After 53 years in medicine, I have come to the conclusion that the practice of medicine is indeed a "practice" and that the admonition Primum Non Nocere has far deeper intent i.e. the level of medical practice falls prey to the bell-shaped curve and a significant percentage of what is done results in harm. The truth is that for many physicians the primary focus of patient outcome takes a backseat to physician income, be it in the form of economics or ego. In this context we miss the value of a key biologic expression: the early diagnosis of cancer, be it prostate cancer (PC) or any form of malignancy. When we miss this "event" we miss what should be a trigger point or alert to assess the patient for the many fuels that cancer uses and the pathology associated with them. So with a diagnosis of PC, we miss the associated bone loss that commonly occurs, and other associations such as kidney disease, lipid abnormalities, cardiovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, etc. In other words, an earlier diagnosis of PC at any age should not result in a reflex response that often equates with invasive therapy, but an assessment of the patient for the many biologic expressions that part and parcel of a cancer diagnosis. I refer to this as SAIN (Systems Analysis & Integrity Networking) medicine, and it offers an opportunity to guide patients to improved quality and quantity of life. In many men, of any age, it may obviate the need for invasive procedures that are costly to the overall well-being of the patient. The fault, dear Brutus lies within us and our failure to see value of PSA testing in the context of truly caring for the patient. We are pinning the tail on the wrong donkey (the PSA test) rather than on those physicians who fall into the wrong part of the bell-shaped curve.
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $32.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.