Summaries for Patients |

Variation in Assessments of Breast Density on Mammograms in Clinical Practice FREE ONLINE FIRST

[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

The full report is titled “Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice. Findings From a Multicenter Observational Study.” The authors are B.L. Sprague, E.F. Conant, T. Onega, M.P. Garcia, E.F. Beaber, S.D. Herschorn, C.D. Lehman, A.N.A. Tosteson, R. Lacson, M.D. Schnall, D. Kontos, J.S. Haas, D.L. Weaver, and W.E. Barlow, on behalf of the PROSPR Consortium.

This article was published at www.annals.org on 19 July 2016.

Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.

Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.

Ann Intern Med. Published online 19 July 2016 doi:10.7326/P16-9021
© 2016 American College of Physicians
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Women with dense breasts are at higher risk for breast cancer. About half of the United States require that information on the density of a woman's breasts be made available to her after a mammogram, and in some states the report must also inform such women about additional tests, such as breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that may detect breast cancer in women who have dense breasts and normal mammograms.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see whether radiologists vary in interpreting mammograms as showing increased breast density.

Who was studied?

83 radiologists who interpreted at least 500 mammograms over 3 years in 30 different facilities that were part of 3 breast cancer research groups.

How was the study done?

Radiologist reports were reviewed for 216,783 mammograms performed on 145,123 women between the ages of 40 and 89 years who had never had a diagnosis of breast cancer and who were having a mammogram for screening (not because they had symptoms of breast cancer, such as a breast lump).

What did the researchers find?

Overall, slightly more than one third of mammograms were rated as showing increased breast density. However, the percentage of mammograms that a particular radiologist interpreted as showing increased breast density ranged widely, from about 6% to almost 85%. This variation among radiologists did not seem to be due to differences in the characteristics of the women who were examined, such as age, race, or body mass index. When women had 2 consecutive mammograms read by different radiologists, about 17% had a finding of increased breast density reported on one mammogram but not the other.

What were the limitations of the study?

The use of additional methods of determining breast density on mammograms, such as automated computer interpretation, was not determined, and the type of mammography equipment used was not analyzed.

What are the implications of the study?

The likelihood that a woman will be told that she has dense breasts on a mammogram may vary depending on which radiologist interprets her examination. Health care providers and policymakers should consider this when they make recommendations for individual patients and develop overall policies for patient notification and supplemental testing.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.