0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal Mammograms

Caryn Lerman, PhD; Bruce Track, PhD; Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH; Alice Boyce, MA; Chris Jepson, PhD; and Paul F. Engstrom, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Grant Support: By institutional grants awarded to Fox Chase Cancer Center (National Institutes of Health grants CA06927 and RR05895) and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Requests for Reprints: Caryn Lerman, PhD, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 510 Township Line Road, Cheltenham, PA 19012.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Lerman, Trock, Rimer, and Jepson and Ms. Boyce: Fox Chase Cancer Center, 510 Township Line Road, Cheltenham, PA 19012.

Dr. Engstrom: Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111.


©1991 American College of PhysiciansAmerican College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(8):657-661. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-657
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To evaluate women's psychological responses to abnormal mammograms and the effect on mammography adherence. To identify psychological responses and other factors that predict mammography adherence in women with normal or abnormal mammograms.

Design: Survey study with prospective analysis of factors associated with mammography adherence.

Setting: Health Maintenance Organization of Pennsylvania and New Jersey (HMO PA/NJ).

Patients: Study patients, members of HMO PA/NJ who were 50 years of age or older, and who had had mammography done 3 months earlier, included women with normal mammograms (n = 121), women with low-suspicion mammograms (n = 119), and women with high-suspicion mammograms (n = 68), but not women with breast cancer.

Measurements: Psychological responses 3 months after mammography and adherence to subsequent annual mammography were assessed.

Main Results: Women with high-suspicion mammograms had substantial mammography-related anxiety (47%) and worries about breast cancer (41%). Such worries affected the moods (26%) and daily functioning (17%) of these women, despite diagnostic evaluation excluding malignancy. For each variable, a consistent trend (P > 0.05) was seen with degree of mammogram abnormality. Sixty-eight percent of women with normal results, 78% of women with low-suspicion results, and 74% of women with high-suspicion results obtained their subsequent annual mammograms (P > 0.05). The number of previous mammograms (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.2) and the effect of the previous results on concerns about breast cancer (odds ratio, 0.5; CI, 0.2 to 1.0) were independent predictors of adherence in logistic regression analyses (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: A substantial proportion of women with suspicious mammograms have psychological difficulties, even after learning that they do not have cancer. Such sequelae do not appear to interfere with subsequent adherence.

Topics

mammography

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Journal Club
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)