0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Limitations of Impedance Plethysmography in the Diagnosis of Clinically Suspected Deep-Vein Thrombosis

David R. Anderson, MD; Anthonie W.A. Lensing, MD, PhD; Philip S. Wells, MD; Mark N. Levine, MD, MSc; Jeffrey I. Weitz, MD; and Jack Hirsh, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Requests for Reprints: David Anderson, MD, Rm 117A, West Wing, Mackenzie Building, Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 148. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Mrs. D. Redshaw, Mrs. J. Cole, Mrs. S. Smale, and Mrs. L. Harrison for their enthusiastic assistance. Grant Support: Dr. Anderson is the recipient of a fellowship from the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation, and Dr. Wells is the recipient of a McLaughlin Fellowship from the University of Ottawa.


Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(1):25-30. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-1-199301010-00005
Text Size: A A A

Objective: To reevaluate the accuracy of impedance plethysmography (IPG) for the detection of proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT).

Patients: A total of 384 of 390 consecutive outpatients referred with their first episode of clinically suspected DVT.

Setting: University-based tertiary care medical center associated with a cancer clinic.

Design: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients whose data were recorded and stored prospectively on a computerized data base over a 22-month period.

Measurements: Patients were evaluated by a physician and underwent IPG testing. Patients with abnormal IPG tests and those with normal IPG results in whom there was a high clinical suspicion of DVT or in whom follow-up IPG testing was not feasible were referred for venography. Venography and IPG results were interpreted by a panel of independent observers. Two models of the IPG instrument were used (Codman 200 and Electrodiagnostic Instruments 800).

Results: Venography (or compression ultrasound) was done in 57 patients with an abnormal IPG test and in 85 patients with normal IPG results. Impedance plethysmography was abnormal in only 37 of 56 patients with confirmed proximal-vein thrombosis (sensitivity, 66%; 95% CI, 52% to 78%). Of the 57 patients with an abnormal IPG result, 37 had DVT (positive predictive value, 65%). The sensitivity for the detection of proximal DVT did not differ between the IPG 200 and 800 instruments (sensitivity, 63% and 71%, respectively; P > 0.2). Of the 19 proximal-vein thrombi not detected by IPG, 12 (63%) were occlusive and 11 (58%) involved at least the popliteal and superficial femoral veins.

Conclusions: At our center, IPG has a far lower sensitivity for proximal-vein thrombosis than has been previously reported for symptomatic outpatients. The reason for this low sensitivity is unclear. Our findings indicate that centers using IPG as the initial diagnostic test for suspected DVT should be aware of this potential problem and should consider reevaluating the sensitivity of their IPG machines by performing venography in a cohort of their patients with normal test results.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the diagnostic workup of patients eligible for study.

The asterisks indicate two patients (one in the impedance plethysmography [IPG] abnormal group and one in the IPG normal group) who had inadequate venograms and were not evaluated with compression ultrasound. These two patients were excluded from the analysis.

Grahic Jump Location
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.
Impedance plethysmographic results in analyzed patients confirmed to have proximal-vein thrombosis.

Sensitivity, 37/56; 66% (95% CI, 52% to 78%); positive predictive value, 37/57; 65%. * Seven patients were diagnosed with proximal-vein thrombosis by compression ultrasound. ** Two patients had proximal deep-vein thrombosis excluded with compression ultrasound. *** Two patients had proximal-vein thrombosis diagnosed by compression ultrasound. **** 242 patients did not undergo venography (or compression ultrasound). Thus, a true figure for the total number of patients in whom proximal-vein thrombosis was absent cannot be determined. IPG = impedance plethysmography.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)