0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Articles |

Bolus or Intravenous Infusion of Ranitidine: Effects on Gastric pH and Acid Secretion: A Comparison of Relative Efficacy and Cost

M. Arturo Ballesteros, MD; Daniel L. Hogan, BA; Michael A. Koss, BS; and Jon I. Isenberg, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

Portions of this work were presented at the annual meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association in Washington, D.C., on 17 May 1989 and published in abstract form (Gastroenterology. 1989;96:A24).

Grant Support: In part by grants from Glaxo Inc. and the National Institutes of Health (AM 33491).

Requests for Reprints: Jon I. Isenberg, MD, Division of Gastroenterology (H-811-D), UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92103.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Ballesteros: Calzada del Desierto, Colonia San Angel Inn, 01000 Mexico D.F., Mexico.

Mr. Hogan and Mr. Koss and Dr. Isenberg: Division of Gastroenterology (H-811-D), UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92103.


© 1990 American College of PhysiciansAmerican College of Physicians


Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(5):334-339. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-5-334
Text Size: A A A

Study Objective: To compare the effects of intravenous bolus injection of ranitidine, continuous intravenous infusion of ranitidine, and placebo on gastric pH, acid secretion, and plasma ranitidine concentration during a 24-hour period, and to determine by survey the use, delivery methods, and costs of histamine H2-receptor antagonists in intensive care units.

Design: Double-blind, Latin-square randomized, prospective measurement of the gastric pH, acid output, and plasma ranitidine concentration over 24 hours in response to six treatment regimens in 12 patients with inactive duodenal ulcer. Eight regional hospitals were surveyed to obtain information on the use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists.

Interventions: Gastric acid secretion, pH, and plasma ranitidine were monitored for 24 hours on six separate days in response to placebo, intravenous bolus injection of ranitidine (50 mg every 8 hours and 75 mg every 12 hours), and continuous intravenous infusion of ranitidine (75, 150, and 300 mg every 24 hours).

Measurements and Main Results: Intravenous infusions were significantly more effective than bolus injections. After bolus injections, hourly gastric pH values fluctuated widely, from 7.6 to 1.6, whereas during continuous infusion of 150 mg and 300 mg, hourly pH values were 3.8 or greater. The gastric pH was greater than 4.0 in 75% ± 5% and 83% + 6% of determinations done during continuous intravenous infusion of 150 mg and 300 mg, respectively. Fluctuations in the plasma ranitidine concentration corresponded with changes in gastric pH and acid secretion. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists were prescribed for about 75% of patients in intensive care units and were most commonly administered by bolus rather than infusion (5:1); the cost was approximately $40 per day less by infusion.

Conclusions: On the basis of both efficacy and cost, intermittent bolus injections should be discontinued and replaced by continuous intravenous infusion in hospitalized patients requiring treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists. If ranitidine is used, either 150 mg or 300 mg administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion is most effective.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)