The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Academia and the Profession |

More Informative Abstracts Revisited

R. Brian Haynes, MD, PhD; Cynthia D. Mulrow, MD, MSc; Edward J. Huth, MD; Douglas G. Altman, BSc; and Martin J. Gardner, PhD
[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

Requests for Reprints: R. Brian Haynes, MD, PhD, Health Information Research Unit, Room 3H7, McMaster University Medical Center, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Haynes: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.

Dr. Mulrow: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78284-7879.

Dr. Huth: 1124 Morris Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010.Mr. Altman: Medical Statistics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories, P.O. Box 123, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, UK WCZA 3PX.

Dr. Gardner: MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.

Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(1):69-76. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69
Text Size: A A A

Following proposals in 1987 and 1988, several medical journals have provided more informative abstracts ("structured abstracts") for articles of clinical interest. Structured abstracts for original studies require authors to systematically disclose the objective, basic research design, clinical setting, participants, interventions (if any), main outcome measurements, results, and conclusions; and for literature reviews the objective, data sources, methods of study selection, data extraction and synthesis, and conclusions. More informative abstracts of this kind can facilitate peer review before publication, assist clinical readers to find articles that are both scientifically sound and applicable to their practices, and allow more precise computerized literature searches. We review the feasibility, acceptability, and dissemination of structured abstracts, reassess the underlying strategy, and describe modifications of the approach. This innovation can aid communication from scientists to clinicians, and other clinical journals are invited to join this effort.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Buy Now for $42.00

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Topic Collections
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.